International Vegan Rights
The human rights that are most relevant to animal rights / vegan advocacy stem from international human rights, which at least in theory apply to every human on the planet. In this section we set out the main international human rights relevant to securing vegan provision in order to promote animal rights. The extent to which these rights are recognised and applied in practice varies country by country; nevertheless, it will be useful for all vegans to be aware that these rights are set out in international treaties to which most countries of the world are signed up.
The United Nations (the UN) was established in 1945, with one of its stated objectives being to “reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women, and of nations large and small.”
The UN adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“UDHR”) in December 1948 in which a number of individual human rights were set out. The UDHR was followed in 1966 by two international human rights treaties, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“the ICCPR”) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The ICCPR gave legal effect to a number of the aspirational rights set out in the UDHR. It is legally binding on states that sign up to it and most states have done so.
Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Belief
One of the key rights contained in the ICCPR is the right to freedom of thought, conscience and belief:
1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.
3. Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others. (Article 18 of the ICCPR).
Freedom of thought and conscience are given equal protection along with freedom of religion and this is to be interpreted broadly, as confirmed by the Human Rights Committee for the ICCPR which noted that:
“The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion…is far-reaching and profound; it encompasses freedom of thought on all matters, personal conviction and the commitment to religion or belief … freedom of thought and the freedom of conscience are protected equally with the freedom of religion and belief.”
The right to freedom of thought, conscience and belief means that we have an absolute right to hold or change our beliefs and convictions; no State or government is entitled to interfere with that under any circumstances. We also have the right to put protected beliefs and convictions into practice. Beliefs or convictions are protected if they are worthy of respect and are not incompatible with the fundamental rights of others. That the vegan conviction, that it is wrong to use and kill non-human animals, is a protected belief which can only be interfered with in limited circumstances has been confirmed in the European context, which we discuss in the next section.
Vegan Parents / Education
Vegan parents have the right to respect for their convictions in relation to state provision of education.
Article 18(4) of the ICCPR provides that “[t]he States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.”
The Human Rights Committee of the ICCPR has stated that:
“The liberty of parents or legal guardians to ensure that their children receive a religious and moral education in conformity with their own convictions … is related to the guarantees of the freedom to teach a religion or belief … public education that includes instruction in a particular religion or belief is inconsistent with [this right] unless provision is made for non-discriminatory exemptions or alternatives that would accommodate the wishes of parents and guardians.”
This right can be referred to in challenging speciesism in education, such as classroom activities involving animal use and course materials that promote the idea that animals are things to be used by humans for what we want from them. The right has been looked at in more detail at a European level, and we discuss that in the next section.
Freedom from Discrimination; Freedom of Expression, Assembly
The ICCPR also contains the right to:
– freedom from discrimination, including on the grounds of “political or other opinion”;
– freedom of expression (to seek, receive and impart information and ideas is a fundamental human right); and
– peaceful assembly.
Interference with these rights is only permitted if set out in law, necessary to achieve a legitimate aim such as public safety or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others, and any restrictions must be proportionate, going no further than is necessary.
Right to Life / Healthy Environment
There is increasing recognition of the need to specifically enshrine in international law the right to a healthy environment, given the links between human rights and environmental protection. For example the 1998 Convention on Access to Information and Public Participation in Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters refers to the right of everyone to an environment adequate to health and well-being. Regional human rights treaties and some national laws have also expressly recognised environmental rights and in some cases the right to life has been used to secure environmental protections. This is an evolving area, which may become increasingly relevant in this time of climate crisis given the key role of animal use in environmental destruction.
ICCPR Obligations on States
Signatories to the ICCPR are required to:
(1) respect and ensure these rights to all individuals within its territory, and
(2) adopt such laws or other measures as are necessary to give effect to these rights.
There is, therefore, a positive obligation on states signatories to ensure that everyone has freedom of thought, conscience and belief, and an obligation to pass such laws as are necessary to achieve that.
However, the ICCPR is an international treaty that operates on a State to State (country to country) level. It lacks any enforcement mechanism for individuals on an international level. It does have an Optional Protocol, which allows individuals to take complaints directly to the Human Rights Commission, but not all states have signed up to that Protocol.
Nevertheless, State parties to the ICCPR are required to ensure that individuals within their territory have a remedy for breaches of their ICCPR rights and this can be used to advocate for change.
Rights of Children
Children have the same human rights as adults, as set out above, and up to the age of 18 they also have additional protections under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. This Convention also contains the rights to freedom of thought, conscience and belief, freedom of expression, association and assembly, and the right to health. In addition it provides, in Article 3, that the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration in all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by a public or private body. In Article 29 it also provides that the education of the child shall be directed to, among other things, the “preparation of the child for responsible life in a free society, in the spirit of understanding, peace, tolerance, equality of sexes, and friendship among all peoples, ethnic, national and religious groups and persons of indigenous origin” and “the development of respect for the natural environment.”
These rights can be referred to in advocacy situations concerning children.
Right to Health and the Right to Food
The right to food is provided for in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (“ICESCR”). Veganism is not a diet but the obstacles affecting a vegan’s ability to live in recognition of the rights of non-human animals frequently concern the availability of suitable food.
In Article 11 of the ICESCR States parties to the Covenant recognise the right of everyone to be free from hunger and they undertake to take steps to ensure people have adequate food, and to disseminate knowledge about nutrition.
The Special Rapporteur on the right to food has expanded on the meaning of this right:
“the right to have regular, permanent and free access, either directly or by means of financial purchases, to quantitatively and qualitatively adequate and sufficient food corresponding to the cultural traditions of the people to which the consumer belongs, and which ensures a physical and mental, individual and collective, fulfilling and dignified life free of fear.”
The ICESCR also contains a right to health. Article 12 recognises “the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health”. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the view that, not only do we not need to consume anything from animals to thrive, but a wholefoods plant-based diet can be highly beneficial for human health.
The right to health and the right to food can be relied on together to advocate for access to affordable, nutritious, plant-based food, and to press for policies that support plant-based production and consumption.
ICESCR Obligations on States
The ICESCR is another international treaty that operates on a State to State (country to country) level. It lacks any enforcement mechanism for individuals on an international level. Moreover, the ICESCR contains only an undertaking by signatories to “take steps towards the progressive realisation” of the rights set out in the Covenant, rather than an immediate undertaking to ensure that these rights are fulfilled. Nevertheless, State parties to the ICESCR have signed up to “take steps to the maximum of [their] available resources” to achieve these rights, and they can be referred to in advocating for change. Moreover, increasing focus is being placed on economic and social rights and in some countries steps are being taken to push for the right to food to be enshrined in national law.
The extent to which international rights are recognised and applied varies from country to country, and there is no general enforcement mechanism for individuals. However, in many countries these rights will be incorporated into national law, automatically or through legislation, and so can be referred to in calling for better provision and, if need be, before national courts. They can also be referred to in pressing for policy change and calling on governments to live up to their international commitments.